W are not amused
Glenn Greenwald cites several reviews of Stephen Colbert’s performance last night and also makes note of an interesting observation:
One of the principal tactics used over the last five years by Bush defenders to transform the president, our public servant, into some sort of monarchical figure is the endless, craven effort to refer to him as “The Commander-in-Chief,” in order to implicitly bestow upon him an aura of elevated, militaristic glory which renders not only disrespect towards the President, but also mere criticism of him, somehow inappropriate, even unpatriotic. In that regard, it was extremely refreshing to see Stephen Colbert’s stand-up routine last night
(video here - transcript here)
at the White House Correspondent’s Dinner. Pam Spaulding provides an excellent discussion of that event, as does Joe Gandelman.
As Pam notes, a commenter at the site of Jonah’s mom, Lucianne Goldberg, said that “Steve Colbert was utterly disgusting. . . He was rude, snarky and unpatriotic toward the President and First Lady.” One can be unpatriotic towards one’s country, but not to the Leader, and certainly not by expresing criticism of the Leader, even to his face. The efforts to shield the President from criticisms of any sort has been one of the most significant factors enabling the lawbreaking pathology of this president, who clearly has come to see himself as a shielded king. The belief that an American citizen is unpatriotic by virtue of criticizing and opposing the president is one of the most pernicious ideas to take hold in some time. What Colbert did took real courage and - like Savage - he should be commended for reminding us of the kind of country we are supposed to have, and the kind of country we aren’t supposed to have and, until this administration, never had.
Colbert’s my hero of the day.
Well done.
Posted: April 30th, 2006 under General.
Comments: none






