an intellect vast and cool and unsympathetic

Main menu:


Categories +/-

Archive +/-

Links +/-

Meta +/-


Subscriptions:

  • Syndicate this site using RSS
  • The latest comments to all posts in RSS
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Add to My MSN
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com
  • Subscribe in Rojo
  • Subscribe in Google Reader
  • Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Furl It!
  • Digg It!
Page Rank Checker




    Leave a comment here to join.
Progressive Women's Blog Ring
Join | List | Previous | Next | Random | Previous 5 | Next 5 | Skip Previous | Skip Next

Archive for September, 2006

A Question of Hats

mikey's many hats

 

This is all really just a question of hats. 

At any given moment, when scrutinizing the stories Michael Brodkorb posts at MDE the question is not, a la Watergate What did the president know and when did he know it? but rather:

Which hat is Brodkorb wearing and when did he start wearing it?

It’s a good question and one that should have been raised long before now, and by a lot more people, particularly those  in local media outlets. 

Brodkorb now seems to think that asking questions is the same thing as attacking MDE:

You are able to attack my work for Mark Kennedy, because FEC rules require expenditures to be public ally reported.  You are able to see that I was paid a one-time fee from Bachmann’s campaign, because it was publicly disclosed. You are able to attack me for my work with the Campaign for St. Paul’s Future, because it was publicly disclosed.  

No, Michael, you’ve got this wrong.  The post at Minnesota Monitor does not attack MDE over your payments from the Kennedy and Bachmann campaigns. Mentioning publicly disclosed data and asking questions relating to that data is not necessarily an attack.  However did you happen to arrive at that mistaken conclusion? 

 

 

US House votes TOMORROW on the Public Expression of Religion Act (H.R. 2679)

Be prepared to contact your Congress-critters today

An action alert from Americans United For Separation of Church and State:

URGENT: House of Representatives will Vote THIS TUESDAY on a Bill to Bar Awards of Attorneys Fees in ALL Establishment Clause Cases

Protect Religious Liberty, Oppose H.R. 2679

On Tuesday, the U.S. House of Representatives is expected to debate legislation which would undermine a critical enforcement mechanism that has safeguarded rights and liberties of Americans for more than a century. The Public Expression of Religion Act (H.R. 2679) would gut the longstanding availability of plaintiffs in Establishment Clause cases — and only those cases — to gain their attorneys fees and costs when they prevail in court.

The federal law making attorneys fees available to plaintiffs in constitutional and civil rights cases has never been limited. Even worse, Congress has never attempted to target specific constitutional rights for attack by limiting attorneys fees in cases involving those rights. Our opponents are going on the offensive with a legislative attack designed to slam the courthouse door on all Establishment Clause plaintiffs, including religious minorities. As a result, this is an extremely important, precedent-setting vote on a bill that directly attacks the central work of Americans United and the fundamental values and freedoms Americans United works so hard to defend.

Enforcement of the Establishment Clause is essential for the defense of religious freedom. The protections of the First Amendment, however, do not enforce themselves. The elimination of the availability of attorneys fees in Establishment Clause cases would deter attorneys from taking these cases — even where the government has acted in direct violation of the Constitution. Plaintiffs would be forced to pay their own legal fees and costs in successful Establishment Clause cases, often totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars. Few Americans, including religious minorities, can afford these kinds of costs to protect their most basic rights.

To take action (scroll down to compose and send letters to your congresspeople)
 

And just what is the Establishment Clause anyway?  Refresh your memory.

 

 

Morning Friday Dark Rainy

It took me two– count’em –TWO hours yesterday to traverse the 20+/- miles from Tildebunkport to Nordeast for the weekly DL festivities. Gaaah. Then once I finally got there the 331 Club seemed even more crowded than usual: the rain kept everyone inside, and it was the farewell (for the season) performance of club fave raves the Tin Star Sisters, plus there had been a rumor that Keith Ellison would be visiting the DLers (as it turned out he had to cancel), so all in all it was a jolly but claustrophobic phone booth stuffing atmosphere which in combination with the accompanying noise and heat produced –voila! — an excruciating headache.

Thankfully there were mitigating circumstances that enabled me to stay until past 8:30 …

As publisher William M Gaines was wont to say in the masthead at MAD magazine, the Usual Gang of Idiots was there, plus veterans of DL at Lyle’s Tor and Eric and Missus Eric (Sorry, I forgot your real name. Don’t hold it against me; please come back anyway!) not to mention Moses’ better half, the lovely and talented Michelle. Dread Pirate Flynt and his Rose were noticeably absent, but then, that forgettable little event their daughter’s wedding is only about two weeks away now, and that may have had something to do with it.

Met and talked awhile with author and business software developer whizkid Joel Turnipseed –and yeah, if that name sounds familiar, it’s probably because we’ve read his stuff at Salon or in the Strib or Granta or Rain Taxi, or have read his 2003 Gulf War memoir Baghdad Express. Joel, you managed to raise the DL bar for articulate conversation up a notch, which is not easy to do with the UGOI, many of whom are almost completely literate. If you can stand it, please come on back, and often!

~~~~~

Browsing through a back issue of Rain Taxi (to read Joel’s review of fellow Gulf war vet Brian Turner’s book of war poetry Here, Bullet) I stumbled happily upon a review written by John Toren, author of Mountain Upside Down (google it) and publisher of the eclectic e-zine Macaroni, which I am also happy to see is still going strong after, what –15 years?

John Toren is an old friend from the long ago, halcyon days of The Bookmen, Inc., the only warehouse in the history of the Twin Cities where the manager of the loading dock also published world-class monographs on subjects ranging from art to architecture to literary criticism, and where, on every Ides of March the employees re-enacted (with cardboard daggers) the assassination scene from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar — all on the then-minimum wage of $2.65 an hour!

The Bookmen warehouse was not that long ago converted into some pretty hoity-toity digs and renamed the Bookmen Lofts. I wonder if any of us who used to work at the Bookmen could afford to live there now?

~~~~~

macaroni cover image

(Click on the image to go to the current issue of Macaroni)

New Drugs For Women

Busy morning for humble wage-serfs such as myself,  and it’s gonna stay busy all day.   No time to read anybody or to post anything that requires more brainpower than knowing how to copy and paste.  The only item that meets that requirement right now is this chestnut that just arrived in my office inbox.  Yeah it’s a bit hoary, but still may induce a grin or two. 

(Men:   if you’ve ever wondered what kind of non-work-related emails women send each other each day at offices throughout the land, this is a classic example.)

 

NEW DRUGS FOR WOMEN

DAMNITOL
Take 2 and the rest of the world can go to hell for up to 8 full hours.

EMPTYNESTROGEN
Suppository that eliminates melancholy and loneliness by reminding you of how awful they were as teenagers and how you couldn’t wait till they moved out.

ST. MOMMA’S WORT
Plant extract that treats mom’s depression by rendering preschoolers unconscious for up to two days.

PEPTOBIMBO
Liquid silicone drink for single women. Two full cups swallowed before an evening out increases breast size, decreases intelligence, and prevents conception.

DUMBEROL
When taken with Peptobimbo, can cause dangerously low IQ, resulting in enjoyment of country music and pickup trucks .

FLIPITOR
Increases life expectancy of commuters by controlling road rage and the urge to flip off other drivers.

MENICILLIN
Potent anti-boy-otic for older women. Increases resistance to such lethal lines as, “You make me want to be a better person. ”

BUYAGRA
Injectable stimulant taken prior to shopping Increases potency, duration, and credit limit of spending spree.

JACKASSPIRIN
Relieves headache caused by a man who can’t remember your birthday, anniversary, phone number, or to lift the toilet seat.

ANTI-TALKSIDENT
A spray carried in a purse or wallet to be used on anyone too eager to share their life stories with total strangers in elevators.

NAGAMENT
When administered to a boyfriend or husband, provides the same irritation level as nagging him.

~~~~~

Hmmm;  that MENICILLIN sounds pretty interesting. I could use a few doses of that..

 

TLAP Day 2006

avast me hearties

        Arrrrr.          

 

But first, a rude word from a very rude sponsor:

(h/t Cap’n PZ)

a rude sponsor

Things we read today

Time for another hyperbolicious blurb from Mal Valour! This week’s fabulous movie stars Duane “The Johnson” Rock.

~~~~~

A wonderful travelogue of a holiday in Brittany, with lots of history and pictures, notably of several of those mysterious “standing stones” formations. And there’s a dog!

~~~~~

Let’s take another, closer look at those breasts, shall we?

still life with driftglass ...and breasts

(photo from Driftglass)

..who parses this “four teacup monsoon” with a bit o’ poesy.

As Tony Curtis was wont to say, in “Spartacus” and elsewhere: “Ahh. Da classics.”

~~~~~

Horror as the Beast-Man Stalks!

Via Cory Doctorow, the Warren Magazine collection of classic horror magazine covers. [Note to self: bookmark this baby now before I forget.]

~~~~~

Yikes. 8:30 already? Sunday breakfast doesn’t make itself you know, and in my household that can mean only one thing. Being endowed by my uterus with special cooking and baking abilities far beyond those of mortal men, I make breakfast.

Back later.

O, the Audacity! …To Be Young, Feminist and Built

MN Observer links to Ann Althouse’s scandalized shitfit so I don’t have to. Oh, and be sure to read the entire comments thread.

Now Jessica of Feministing (the object of this frenzy of onehanded wingnut conjecture) responds.

BTW, dear Jessica (says I): Keep standing up straight; chin up; shoulders back. You make me proud, kid.

*sigh* Yet again I find myself wishing I had a daughter, or daughters. No, not instead of my sons. In addition to!

Hey, where’d I put that “Estrogen: flaunt it if you’ve got it” pic I posted a year or two ago?…

Ahh. Here it is:

got estrogen?  flaunt it

I could never be a woman, ’cause I’d just stay home and play with my breasts all day.” - - Steve Martin in LA Story

You might die of envy to hear this, Steve, but the attractive, agreeable, young (ie,  preferred) women and the fat old ugly man-hating feminists concur on this opinion:  Having breasts is fun!

UPDATE: When I posted this earlier today, I should have known that the fun had only just begun.

Julia of Sisyphus Shrugged to Ann Althouse:

Wank the fuck on, dear.

Hmmmm; I’ll bet Ann decides to take a different tack the next time she throws a tantrum because she wasn’t invited to lunch with the kool kids du jour and the Clenis.

Dr. Helen the Insta-Wife joins in:

We Don’t Support Gropers Except For Bill Clinton

..to which Amanda replies:

If you’re wondering what’s motivating Ann and Dr. Helen to hiss and spit in Jessica’s direction, the comments from their male readers in the threads bring it all to light. Ann even helpfully noted that she thinks that Jessica looks like Monica Lewinsky, so that her imagination-stunted readers put two and two together and got the idea—Lewinsky performed that oral sex we’ve been hearing so much about! This is important for some reason! Dark-haired girls must do that act we’ve heard about! If you want to start a research project on the relationship of sexual repression and right wing nuttery, those comment threads are a good place to start.

The fabulous Echidne has the last word (at least for the moment):

I am very tempted to join in the fray and to start sending arrows here and there, but I will restrain myself, don a neutral pin-striped business suit and write about something very erudite and academic.

Which is tits and their role in feminism. And don’t worry, I first bound my own breasts very tightly. If I stood slightly angled towards you I might come across as almost breastless. Or breast-free or something. Except that now I can’t breathe at all. Argh. Proper erudite feminism is damn inconvenient.

Friday Spong blogging: Look, Kids — Real Christians!

Whenever I post an essay or Q&A from retired Episcopal Bishop John Shelby Spong my blog traffic nearly doubles. It says something about the interests and mood of my readers when the single most-read post this blog has published so far this year is Spong: Mr. Bush is a Public Embarrassment.

A multitude of people are disappointed, to say the least, by what they’ve been hearing these days from so-called Christians. For years now the loudest and most strident voices of the Christian church in America have been those of fundamentalists and evangelicals whose yearnings to be the holy hall monitors in a new American authoritarian theocracy have played into the hands of the Republican party as well as drowned out the voices of reason, rationality and inclusiveness that are as much a part of the American religious landscape.

I am not a Christian, altho I was baptised and raised Lutheran. Like so many other families in south Minneapolis, mine went to Mount Olivet, which for decades has been the largest Lutheran congregation in the US. When I married and had kids, my Lutheran-raised husband and I joined St. Andrew Lutheran, a young Eden Prairie congregation with aspirations of growing up to be another Mount Olivet, a goal it’s well on the way to achieving. When we joined in 1987 St. Andrew had about 1500 confirmed members, which made it a big church even then. The last time I saw the numbers, which is probably a couple of years ago now, that congregation total had grown to nearly 7,000 confirmed members–and if you factor in all the kids by including the baptised but not yet confirmed members, the total tops 10,000 — putting St. Andrew squarely in the “megachurch” bracket.

While my kids were very young, I remained a member at St. Andrew because I felt it was important for them to learn about Lutheranism — the church tradition of both sides of our family since the dawn of time. My advice to my sons has been: Go to your confirmation classes; learn something about the Christian church and the Lutheran denomination; be confirmed; and as you continue to grow and venture out into the world, learn about as many other spiritual belief systems as you can and make up your own minds.

That’s what I did, and it’s why I cannot call myself a Christian any longer.

Altho it took 30 years to admit it to myself, the fall-away confrontation between me and the Christian church actually happened when I was very young. It doesn’t take too many hours of listening to liturgies full of ‘Father’ this and ‘Son’ that and ‘His’ everything for a girl to learn that in the church there is only one gender that counts, and it ain’t hers. I have never been able to understand how any woman can fully buy into Christianity when she’s constantly reminded of how peripheral, how secondary, how less worthy, how less than human she is in the eyes of the church. Obviously, others don’t feel the same way, and more power to them, but as for me: I’m having none of it. Once the scales fall from my eyes, ain’t no way to glue ‘em back on again.

Having said all that, I remain a human being whose journey through life has a spiritual component. When I find someone whose expression of their own search for spiritual meaning resonates with me, and restores to me even one tiny iota of hope for the future of the human race, I hold that person close, and that’s why I cherish Spong.

Today the good Bishop writes an article about the recent activities of (who’d-a thunk they existed?) some real, live, progressive Christians:

[All boldfacing of text for emphasis is my doing]

September 13, 2006
Crosswalk America Arrives in Washington, DC

It began on April 16, 2006, following a sunrise service in Phoenix, Arizona. It ended on September 3, 2006, at a celebration in the Foundry United Methodist Church in Washington, DC. Between those two dates, more than five million steps were taken, at least three pairs of shoes per person were worn out, over 2,500 miles were registered and 12 states were crossed. These fascinating facts constituted just a few of the dimensions of the journey undertaken and completed by a group of people, who called themselves “Crosswalk America.” The purpose of their walk was to lift up another face of Christianity that is quite different from the Christianity seen in the media today.

They walked to publicize something they called the ‘Phoenix Affirmations’ that involve these principles:

Christians must have an openness to other faiths
Christians must care for the earth and its ecosystem
Christians must value artistic _expression in all its forms
Christians must welcome and include all persons
Christians must oppose the co-mingling of Church and State
Christians must seek peace and end systemic poverty
Christians must promote the values of rest and recreation, prayer and reflection
Christians must embrace both faith and science

It was the hope of this group, who certainly put their bodies where their mouths were, to raise in the national awareness the presence of the progressive Christian movement throughout America. They were tired of having the Christian faith, to which each walker was deeply committed, constantly identified with the negativity of the anti-abortion movement and the anger of the anti-homosexual stance employed by so many who use the name Christian. They wanted to demonstrate that those who are committed to Christ would not set the citizens of this land against each other over differing religious beliefs and practices. Their desire was to turn the present course of Christianity in America away from its divisive pro-war, anti-female, anti-gay public face, where those who disagree are relegated to an emotional status somewhere between being excommunicated and burned at the stake,to a religion identified with the words ‘love’ and ‘inclusion.’

In every community entered across this nation, these walkers went to the local churches, identified themselves and shared their message. They worshiped in all kinds of settings, deliberately including the most fundamentalist. One was called ‘The Jesus Baptist Church’ in Springerville, Texas, that stated publicly their belief in the inerrancy of the Bible and the sinfulness of homosexuality, but they also worshiped in a Metropolitan Community Church in New Mexico, that was organized just for homosexual people who had been forced out of their churches by religious and biblical prejudice.

One town that was not eager to entertain the walkers had only very conservative churches, yet they found a welcome in that town from a group of people who, tired of the religious atmosphere in their own community, had formed a “House Church” that met every Sunday. In the Texas town of Bovina, less than 30 miles from the town of Hereford, the names of which indicate the dominance of the cattle industry in Texas, they discovered that their stance on inclusiveness was not nearly so offensive to the locals as the fact that three of the walkers were vegetarians!

Read more »

2Gether 4Ever

Hey Mikey:

Why so modest with the “draft” disclaimer? Those Ellison/Hatch bumperstickers are great! I’ll take 2 dozen.

Want some of these?

george w bush and mark kennedy = 2gether 4ever

ADDED just for you 1st CD folks:

geo & gil

the Olbermann factor

Over at Salon Alex Koppelman interviews MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann, who is pretty much the sole reason I watch teevee these days.

Keith’s recent string of stellar commentaries has made waves everywhere, not just in the reality-based half of the blogosphere:

In the past two weeks, as the Bush administration launched its pre-election anti-terror public relations blitz, Olbermann upped the ante and cemented his hero status in Left Blogistan with two especially acid speeches. On Aug. 30, he blistered Donald Rumsfeld with a breathtaking on-air screed that called the defense secretary a quack, explicitly compared him to Neville Chamberlain, and implicitly accused him of fascism and McCarthyism. President Bush himself for an “awful,” “cynical” and “un-American” equation of dissent and disloyalty. Olbermann, who usually ends his commentaries with a quote that pays tribute to Edward R. Murrow — “Good night and good luck” — instead closed with a different, and much angrier, echo of the McCarthy era. He asked the president, “Have you no sense of decency, sir?”

On his commentaries’ effect on “Countdown”’s ratings:

I think we’re up about 9 percent in that demographic [25-54], and CNN is down 30 and Fox is off 23 percent. I don’t think you can say, “Hey, we did this commentary and the ratings doubled the next night.” It doesn’t usually work that way. But overall we’ve had a very steady climb, a climb from third place in the ratings to essentially second place in the ratings, and I think you can attribute it to the approach, if not the specifics, of the commentaries.

On Katrina as precipitator of tumbling ratings for Bush and for Fox News:

It’s ironic that a natural disaster would serve to be the tipping point, but I think there was just no convincing even the people who wanted to be convinced that everything was great after what people saw in the United States of America in New Orleans. It was overwhelming. And it had, although it was not given credit for it at the time, or blame, the kind of visceral impact that 9/11 didn’t in a different sense, that it woke people up to the idea that a government that was reelected on the premise that it was going to protect everyone from everything, and that the other guys probably couldn’t — did not get the job done. And I think a lot of people at that point began to say, to use that classic and most overwrought of clichés, that the kid in the front there is right: The emperor is not wearing anything except new clothes that only he can see. He’s naked, and much of what he’d told us besides that is probably not true.

I think that the news operations that were willing to address that, to approach it in any kind of analytical way, even by means of commentary, could benefit in a situation where people are looking for the truth. And an organization that is beholden to a political party and to a point of view — entirely beholden to that — is going to lose, as they have.

The salesmanship techniques and the production techniques that they are expert at have not suddenly slipped, which is I believe their conclusion. It’s not their guys who’ve suddenly seemed implausible, except the ones who have stuck to the party line, but it’s the message. “Gee whiz, everything’s great, everything’s great, it’s the media’s fault.” I don’t think that’s what most of America feels anymore, and I think that has been reflected particularly in the ratings at Fox News.

Berating Bill O’Reilly Naah, actually he’s dismissing poor old increasingly-irrelevant Bill-O for not holding up his end of their long-running feud:

He [O'Reilly] attacked MSNBC [on his show] along with a plethora of usual suspects for, in his opinion, misreporting the Valerie Plame story, and demanded that we say that we’re sorry that Karl Rove was not indicted. And I said, “All right, Bill, you’re right. We are sorry Karl Rove wasn’t indicted. But please, I can’t play with you now. I have bigger fish to fry.”

From, let’s see, a year, year and a half ago, the whole tenor of this thing changed. It had essentially been me pointing out what kind of crap he was putting on the air, and then it became anything that was said about Bill merited some sort of brilliant overreaction, like an on-air petition to get me fired. Or this thing — and it would be really funny in a different context — where he thought he could call up Fox security and local police and get them to somehow go to the house of someone who called his radio show and mentioned my name. I just wait for his overreactions and respond to them now. It’s really, it’s almost a passive feud from my end. Also, the level of the fight from him has dropped off appreciably. His stuff is getting very old, and we’ve had to raise the bar a little bit higher because his answers get a little lower. So we devote less and less time to him. I wouldn’t say a truce, but I don’t think there’s very much fight left in him at this point.

On courting the favors of liberals:

I had gathered for a while that [liberals] had felt themselves very underserved in the media, and a reasonable analysis would suggest that’s true overall. But you can go out and, I think, find a certain kind of person who wants to sit there and be told what to think by the television. These tend to be authoritarian personalities, as John Dean has suggested in his book. I don’t know if it’s true for other political people. I don’t think you can get a bunch of liberals to watch one television network, because they’d be sitting there arguing the nuance of it. So I’m not courting the liberals.

I also, I don’t think in these issues that I’m a liberal; I think that I’m an American. I think I’m acting almost as a historian on these particular things, with the Rumsfeld commentary and now the Bush commentary. I get nauseated when I see someone perpetually wrap themselves in the flag — which is the logo that appears on Fox, that’s what they’re doing, and many other people do it.

You know, every once in a while you should bring the flag out and say, “What does our country stand for?” The first thing that I think of is the statement that I disagree with your beliefs, but I will fight to the death for your right to express them. When the secretary of defense and the president of the United States make statements that indicate those statements are no longer operative, then you have to say something. It’s no longer liberal versus conservative at that point. It’s American versus truly un-American. So I’m not courting anybody with these things, I’m saying these things because I think they need to be said. I think they need to be underlined and underscored in the public discourse.

Yep, I think it would definitely be fair to say that I heart Keith. He’s our Edward R Murrow:  just as articulate, but with more falafel jokes.