MN Observer links to Ann Althouse’s scandalized shitfit so I don’t have to. Oh, and be sure to read the entire comments thread.
Now Jessica of Feministing (the object of this frenzy of onehanded wingnut conjecture) responds.
BTW, dear Jessica (says I): Keep standing up straight; chin up; shoulders back. You make me proud, kid.
*sigh* Yet again I find myself wishing I had a daughter, or daughters. No, not instead of my sons. In addition to!
Hey, where’d I put that “Estrogen: flaunt it if you’ve got it” pic I posted a year or two ago?…
Ahh. Here it is:

“ I could never be a woman, ’cause I’d just stay home and play with my breasts all day.” – - Steve Martin in LA Story
You might die of envy to hear this, Steve, but the attractive, agreeable, young (ie, preferred) women and the fat old ugly man-hating feminists concur on this opinion: Having breasts is fun!
UPDATE: When I posted this earlier today, I should have known that the fun had only just begun.
Julia of Sisyphus Shrugged to Ann Althouse:
Hmmmm; I’ll bet Ann decides to take a different tack the next time she throws a tantrum because she wasn’t invited to lunch with the kool kids du jour and the Clenis.
Dr. Helen the Insta-Wife joins in:
..to which Amanda replies:
The fabulous Echidne has the last word (at least for the moment):
I am very tempted to join in the fray and to start sending arrows here and there, but I will restrain myself, don a neutral pin-striped business suit and write about something very erudite and academic.
Which is tits and their role in feminism. And don’t worry, I first bound my own breasts very tightly. If I stood slightly angled towards you I might come across as almost breastless. Or breast-free or something. Except that now I can’t breathe at all. Argh. Proper erudite feminism is damn inconvenient.












This is insane. And the more I read about this, the more convinced I am she should have worn a red bustier.
With twirling tassels!