an intellect vast and cool and unsympathetic

Main menu:


Categories +/-

Archive +/-

Links +/-

Meta +/-


Subscriptions:

  • Syndicate this site using RSS
  • The latest comments to all posts in RSS
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Add to My MSN
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com
  • Subscribe in Rojo
  • Subscribe in Google Reader
  • Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Furl It!
  • Digg It!
Page Rank Checker




    Leave a comment here to join.
Progressive Women's Blog Ring
Join | List | Previous | Next | Random | Previous 5 | Next 5 | Skip Previous | Skip Next

Archive for November, 2007

Who Is Ayaan Hirsi Ali?

ayaan hirsi ali as nancy drew

From Joshua Holland’s article:

“Who is Ayaan Hirsi Ali?

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a household name in Europe. Her story would seem far-fetched if it were fiction. Born in Somalia to a critic of the dictatorship of Siad Barré, her family fled when she was six — first to Saudi Arabia and then to Ethiopia before finally settling in Kenya. There she attended a Saudi-funded religious school and was, in her words, “indoctrinated” into a traditionalist form of Islam. She recalls that she wore a hijab, supported the fatwa calling for the death of Salman Rushdie and had a knee-jerk hatred of Jews. Until, that is, she started reading Nancy Drew mysteries. Fascinated by a female character who operated freely in society, Hirsi Ali would later say that the stories played a major role in changing her attitudes towards the West.”

I’ve been selling a real book of hers, Infidel , in the bookstore for the past week. Coincidentally, yesterday, November 13th, was Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s birthday.

The Strange Journey of Ayaan Hirsi Ali: From Devout Muslim to Outspoken “Feminist” Critic of Islam

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted November 12, 2007.

American conservatives embrace Dutch firebrand’s calls for destruction of Islam.

The former “liberal” who becomes an outspoken right-winger has become an American political archetype. Ronald Reagan and David Horowiz are two prime examples of the breed.

They use the rhetorical tool of claiming to be just as caring and compassionate as their previous political incarnation, but the left’s irrationality and hatred of (you pick it) the West, America, Christianity, capitalism, etc. caused them to wake up one morning and see the light. And having transformed from lefty caterpillar into a right-leaning butterfly, they present themselves as qualified to comment on liberalism’s moral and intellectual failures.

Recently, a related version of this turncoat persona — former Dutch Member of Parliament Ayaan Hirsi Ali — has emerged: a “reformed” Muslim woman who favors crushing Islam under the boot of Western militarism. Once very devout in her Muslim beliefs, Ali has gained a great deal of media attention — including horrific tales of her abuse at the hands of Muslim men — and has transformed into an outspoken critic who bases her calls for the destruction of Islam on feminist and human rights principles.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a proud Somali woman raised in a devout Muslim family. She is poised to become the most recognizable face of naked Islamophobia in America. Expect to see her as a ubiquitous guest on cable news channels and frequent contributor of op-eds reinforcing the worst stereotypes about the Muslim world. She’ll validate already disturbingly common narratives about the perfidy of Islam, and she’ll tout the vast superiority of Western thinking in stark terms that would be shocking coming from a more traditional (read: white, Christian) right-wing commentator.

It’s a criticism of Islam, coming from the left, which has the potential to unite the Islamophobic right with an increasingly vocal secular movement. It also provides cover for extremist views, bringing hateful rhetoric that’s typically been confined to the margins into the mainstream and broadening the already frighteningly large constituency that exists in the U.S. for a series of “preventive” wars in the Middle East, Central Asia and elsewhere.

She has been called an “enlightenment fundamentalist” in Europe and is a hated apostate in much of the Muslim world. She lives under a flurry of death threats and needs round-the-clock security.

Because she’s an intelligent and articulate woman who has suffered horrific abuses in a Muslim family, her generalizations about the entire Islalmic world are imbued with an unwarranted authority. There’s a real danger that people like Hirsi Ali — the tiny percentage of the Muslim world who believe that Islam really is “the problem” will skew the debate about U.S. relations with the Muslim world.

Thank God for the Enlightenment

Hirsi Ali has become a darling of those who believe in the benevolence of Western hegemony; The Economist described her as a “cultural ideologue of the new right.” But she’s more than that; Hirsi Ali occupies a unique space in the political landscape. Her outspoken advocacy on feminist ethical issues — roundly condemning “honor killings” and female circumcision — has also made her a poster-girl for the aggressive brand of atheism typified by figures like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens, all three of whom have held her life-story up as an example of the harms caused by religion in general, and Islam in particular. For them, she’s a living testament to the idea that rational liberal interventionists in the post-Enlightenment West have a moral duty to wage a new crusade against the Muslim world. Harris and Salman Rushdie penned an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times calling Hirsi Ali a “unique and indispensable witness to both the strength and weakness of the West: to the splendor of open society and to the boundless energy of its antagonists.”

Neely Tucker wrote in the Washington Post that “Neoconservative, middle-aged white men … tend to swoon when she walks into the room.” Hirsi Ali is indeed charming and articulate, possessed of a rare intelligence and gifted with exceptional language and political skills. But she’s also an extremist, by any measure. She goes beyond others who embrace the idea of a “Clash of Civilizations” — people like Tony Blankley and Michael Ledeen — in her insistence that all of Islam is extreme. “There is no moderate Islam,” she told Reason. There can only be peace between East and West, she said, “if Islam is defeated.” When asked if she meant radical Islam, she replied: “No. Islam, period. Once it’s defeated, it can mutate into something peaceful. It’s very difficult to even talk about peace now. They’re not interested in peace.”

She calls the religion, with 1.3 billion adherents worldwide, a “death cult.”

That’s a popular claim in the post-9/11 era, and Ayaan Hirsi Ali is no doubt set for life. Her long journey has taken her from Africa to Europe and now, finally, to the right-wing American Enterprise Institute (she’s currently working out of Holland because the Dutch government refused to pay for her body-guards in DC). As long as the concept of a broken and dysfunctional Muslim world is used to justify Western militarism in the Middle East and Central Asia, Hirsi Ali will have a cushy sinecure somewhere within the right-wing media establishment, ready to be rolled out as exhibit A in the case against whatever country is that day’s enemy-du-jour and, perhaps more importantly, against anyone who views the Muslim world as anything other than a uniform bunch of blood-thirsty maniacs.

While Hirsi Ali is loved by some and loathed by others, what gets lost is that Ayaan Hirsi Ali is as genuine in her beliefs as she is wrong on the facts. She suffered a cruel upbringing in a stringent Muslim household — she describes the horrors of undergoing female genital mutilation at age five and claims she was forced into an arranged marriage in her teens (a claim her family and former husband dispute), so the issue is not whether she is sincere, but whether the victim of an abusive childhood should be viewed as an impartial and credible analyst. It’s the equivalent of a Catholic choirboy who, having been the victim of sexual abuse at the hands of pedophile priests, is asked for an impartial view of the church. That would never happen, but Hirsi Ali will be called upon to explain the dangers of Islam to an eager West as if she’s a knowledgeable but detached observer. That’s problematic in that she’s a woman whose views are colored by an upbringing that is: A) anything but universal within Islam and B) in no way exclusive to that culture.

Read more »

Conservative Authors Sue Eagle/Regnery Publishing

When I started my part time bookstore job last month, I began to hear anecdotes from my fellow booksellers about customer habits, quirks and trends.  One such discussion concerned customer complaints about which books we stock and which books we don’t.   

I was unsurprised to learn that we regularly get complaints from customers who think that we don’t carry enough “conservative” titles.  Thinking there must also be corresponding complaints from the other side of the aisle, I asked “But what about on the flip side?”  To which my colleague answered “Oh yeah, we also get those same customers complaining that we carry too many ‘liberal” titles.”     

That’s as fair and balanced as it gets, folks.  Complaints, complaints, who’s got complaints? Let’s start with these guys…

From the New York Times:

Conservative Authors Sue Publisher

By MOTOKO RICH
Published: November 7, 2007

Five authors have sued the parent company of Regnery Publishing, a Washington imprint of conservative books, charging that the company deprives its writers of royalties by selling their books at a steep discount to book clubs and other organizations owned by the same parent company.

In a suit filed in United States District Court in Washington yesterday, the authors Jerome R. Corsi, Bill Gertz, Lt. Col. Robert (Buzz) Patterson, Joel Mowbray and Richard Miniter state that Eagle Publishing, which owns Regnery, “orchestrates and participates in a fraudulent, deceptively concealed and self-dealing scheme to divert book sales away from retail outlets and to wholly owned subsidiary organizations within the Eagle conglomerate.”

Some of the authors’ books have appeared on the New York Times best-seller list, including “Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry,” by Mr. Corsi and John E. O’Neill (who is not a plaintiff in the suit), Mr. Patterson’s “Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised America’s National Security” and Mr. Miniter’s “Shadow War: The Untold Story of How Bush Is Winning the War on Terror.” In the lawsuit the authors say that Eagle sells or gives away copies of their books to book clubs, newsletters and other organizations owned by Eagle “to avoid or substantially reduce royalty payments to authors.”

Among other reasons.   Duh.  There’s certainly no way Eagle/Regnery could ever get rid of their toxic little screeds by actually selling them  in a bookstore or an online retailer.  I mean,  come on.  Who buys this crap? And when they do, who pays retail?   In fact, I’d be willing to bet that many of the “book clubs” and “other organizations” mentioned here are nothing more than truckloads of Eagle/Regnery books discreetly dumped in out of the way landfills.   

The authors argue that in reducing royalty payments, the publisher is maximizing its profits and the profits of its parent company at their expense.
“They’ve structured their business essentially as a scam and are defrauding their writers,” Mr. Miniter said in an interview, “causing a tremendous rift inside the conservative community.”

And that “tremendous rift inside the conservative community” is — where?   Unless he means that huge schism between the authoritarian-follower wingnuts and the knuckledragging freepers.

Traditionally, authors receive a 15 percent royalty based on the cover price of a hardcover title after they have sold enough copies to cover the cost of the advance they receive upon signing a contract with a publisher. (Authors whose books are sold at steep discounts or to companies that handle remaindered copies receive lower royalties.)

In Regnery’s case, according to the lawsuit, the publisher sells books to sister companies, including the Conservative Book Club, which then sells the books to members at discounted prices, “at, below or only marginally above its own cost of publication.” In the lawsuit the authors say they receive “little or no royalty” on these sales because their contracts specify that the publisher pays only 10 percent of the amount received by the publisher, minus costs — as opposed to 15 percent of the cover price — for the book.

Mr. Miniter said that meant that although he received about $4.25 a copy when his books sold in a bookstore or through an online retailer, he only earned about 10 cents a copy when his books sold through the Conservative Book Club or other Eagle-owned channels. “The difference between 10 cents and $4.25 is pretty large when you multiply it by 20,000 to 30,000 books,” Mr. Miniter said. “It suddenly occurred to us that Regnery is making collectively jillions of dollars off of us and paying us a pittance.” He added: “Why is Regnery acting like a Marxist cartoon of a capitalist company?”

Oh, who cares what kind of a cartoon it is, as long as it’s this funny?

In an e-mail statement, Bruce W. Sanford, a lawyer with Baker Hostetler, a Washington firm representing Eagle and Regnery, said: “No publisher in America has a more acute marketing sense or successful track record at building promotional platforms for books than Regnery Publishing. These disgruntled authors object to marketing strategies used by all major book publishers that have proved successful time and again as witnessed by dozens of Regnery bestsellers.”

The authors also say in the lawsuit that Regnery donates books to nonprofit groups affiliated with Eagle Publishing and gives the books as incentives to subscribers to newsletters published by Eagle. The authors say they do not receive royalties for these books.

“You get 10 per cent of nothing because they basically give them away,” Mr. Patterson said in an interview.

The authors argue that because at least a quarter and as much as half of their book sales are diverted to nonretail channels, sales figures of their books on Nielsen BookScan, which tracks about 70 percent of retail sales but does not reflect sales through book clubs and other outlets used by Eagle, are artificially low. Publishers use these figures when determining future book deals, and the authors argue that actions by Eagle and Regnery have long-term effects on their careers.

Mr. Miniter said that when he was negotiating a book deal with Threshold Editions, a conservative imprint of Simon & Schuster, he could have gotten a higher advance if BookScan reflected the true quantity of sales of his books.

Nullifidian explains just how ridiculous this is.

According to BookScan, Mr. Miniter’s “Shadow War” sold 46,000 copies in hardcover, and “Losing Bin Laden” sold 36,000 copies in hardback.

Careful what you wish for…  “Miniter’s temper tantrum gets redirected at Regnery. He wants them to stop bulk-ordering through retail, bringing the BookScan figures into line with the actual sales figures. However, this will only succeed in ensuring that nothing he writes ever again will get onto the NYT Bestseller list, and without that preliminary buzz, he won’t even get 36,000 next time—more like 10,000 if he’s lucky.”  

Mr. Miniter, who spearheaded the legal action, said he became aware of the discrepancies in royalty payments while defending a separate arbitration initiated by Regnery over a canceled contract. Mr. Miniter said that during the arbitration, which is pending, he saw royalty statements in which it appeared that about half his books’ sales had not gone through stores, and that his payments for those sales were much lower than the payments for bookstore sales. He contacted other Regnery authors and learned that they saw similar patterns on their royalty statements.

Joel Mowbray, author of “Dangerous Diplomacy: How the State Department Threatens America’s Security,” said he was particularly disappointed in Regnery and Eagle because they had so championed conservative authors. “These guys created the conservative book market,” Mr. Mowbray said. “Before them, conservatives were having to fight, generally unsuccessfully, to get books published.”

The authors, who say in the lawsuit that Eagle has been “unjustly enriched well in excess of one million dollars,” are seeking unspecified damages. But Mr. Miniter said, “We’re not looking for a payoff; we’re looking for justice.”

And what are we looking for? To paraphrase a little more from Nullifidian:  a bumper crop of shadenfreude at the expense of these poor little dears.  

Sweet. 

~~~

 

Have you got Ethel the Aardvark Goes Quantity Surveying?

Recently I’ve once again gone back into the bookselling game on a limited basis. Over the last 30 years this is my fourth bookstore gig, and so to celebrate my homecoming into a beloved trade, here is an uncannily accurate depiction of a typical day in a bookseller’s life…

The Bookshop Sketch from “Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl”

Customer: (entering the bookshop) Good morning.
Proprietor (John Cleese): Good morning, sir. Can I help you?
C: Er, yes. Do you have a copy of “Thirty Days in the Samarkind Desert with
the Duchess of Kent” by A. E. J. Eliott, O.B.E.?
P: Ah, well, I don’t know the book, sir….
C: Er, never mind, never mind. How about “A Hundred and One Ways to
Start a Fight”?
P: …By?
C: An Irish gentleman whose name eludes me for the moment.
P: Ah, no, well we haven’t got it in stock, sir….
C: Oh, well, not to worry, not to worry. Can you help me with “David
Coperfield”?
P: Ah, yes, Dickens.
C: No….
P: (pause) I beg your pardon?
C: No, Edmund Wells.
P: I… *think* you’ll find Charles Dickens wrote “David Copperfield”, sir….
C: No, no, Dickens wrote “David Copperfield” with *two* Ps. This is
“David Coperfield” with *one* P by Edmund Wells.
P: “David Coperfield” with one P?
C: Yes, I should have said.
P: Yes, well in that case we don’t have it.
C: (peering over counter) Funny, you’ve got a lot of books here….
P: (slightly perturbed) Yes, we do, but we don’t have “David Coperfield”
with one P by Edmund Wells.
C: Pity, it’s more thorough than the Dickens.
P: More THOROUGH?!?
C: Yes…I wonder if it might be worth a look through all your “David Copper-
field”s…
P: No, sir, all our “David Copperfield”s have two P’s.
C: Are you quite sure?
P: Quite.
C: Not worth just looking?
P: Definitely not.
C: Oh…how ’bout “Grate Expectations”?
P: Yes, well we have that….
C: That’s “G-R-A-T-E Expectations,” also by Edmund Wells.
P: (pause) Yes, well in that case we don’t have it. We don’t have anything
by Edmund Wells, actually: he’s not very popular.
C: Not “Knickerless Knickleby”? That’s K-N-I-C-K-E-R-L-E-S-S.
P: (taciturn) No.
C: “Khristmas Karol” with a K?
P: (really quite perturbed) No….
C: Er, how about “A Sale of Two Titties”?
P: DEFINITELY NOT.
C: (moving towards door) Sorry to trouble you….
P: Not at all….
C: Good morning.
P: Good morning.
C: (turning around) Oh!
P: (deep breath) Yesss?
C: I wonder if you might have a copy of “Rarnaby Budge”?
P: No, as I say, we’re right out of Edmund Wells!
C: No, not Edmund Wells - Charles Dikkens.
P: (pause - eagerly) Charles Dickens??
C: Yes.
P: (excitedly) You mean “Barnaby Rudge”!
C: No, “Rarnaby Budge” by Charles Dikkens. That’s Dikkens with two Ks, the
well-known Dutch author.
P: (slight pause) No, well we don’t have “Rarnaby Budge” by Charles Dikkens
with two Ks, the well-known Dutch author, and perhaps to save time I
should add that we don’t have “Karnaby Fudge” by Darles Chickens, or
“Farmer of Sludge” by Marles Pickens, or even “Stickwick Stapers” by Farles
Wickens with four M’s and a silent Q!!!!! Why don’t you try W. H. Smith’s?
C: Ah did, They sent me here.
P: DID they.
C: Oh, I wonder…
P: Oh, do go on, please.
C: Yes…I wonder if you might have “The Amazing Adventures of Captain Gladys
Stoutpamphlet and her Intrepid Spaniel Stig Amongst the Giant Pygmies of
Beckles”…volume eight.
P: (after a pause for recovery) No, we don’t have that…funny, we’ve got a lot
of books here…well, I musn’t keep you standing here…thank you,–
C: Oh, well do, do you have– —\
P: No, we haven’t. No, we haven’t. |
C: B-b-b-but– |
P: Sorry, no, it’s one o’clock now, we’re |
closing for lunch– |
C: Ah, I–I saw it– |——-loud arguments
P: I’m sorry– |
C: I saw it over there! I saw it… |
P: What? What? WHAT?!? —/
C: I saw it over there: “Olsen’s Standard Book of British Birds”.
P: (pause; trying to stay calm) “Olsen’s Standard Book of British Birds”?
C: Yes…
P: O-L-S-E-N?
C: Yes….
P: B-I-R-D-S??
C: Yes…..
P: (beat) Yes, well, we do have that, as a matter of fact….
C: The expurgated version….
P: (pause; politely) I’m sorry, I didn’t quite catch that…?
C: The expurgated version.
P: (exploding) The EXPURGATED version of “Olsen’s Standard Book of British
Birds”?!?!?!?!?
C: (desperately) The one without the gannet!
P: The one without the gannet-!!! They’ve ALL got the gannet!! It’s a
Standard British Bird, the gannet, it’s in all the books!!!
C: (insistent) Well, I don’t like them…they wet their nests.
P: (furious) All right! I’ll remove it!! (rrrip!) Any other birds you don’t
like?!
C: I don’t like the robin…
P: (screaming) The robin! Right! The robin! (rrrip!) There you are, any
others you don’t like, any others?
C: The nuthatch?
P: Right! (flipping through the book) The nuthatch, the nuthatch, the
nuthatch, ‘ere we are! (rrriiip!) There you are! NO gannets, NO robins,
NO nuthatches, THERE’s your book!
C: (indignant) I can’t buy that! It’s torn!
P: (incoherent noise)
C: Ah, I wonder if you have–
P: God, ask me anything!! We got lots of books here, you know, it’s a
bookshop!!
C: Er, how ’bout “Biggles Combs his Hair”?
P: No, no, we don’t have that one, funny!
C: “The Gospel According to Charley Drake”?
P: No, no, no, try me again!
C: Ah…oh, I know! “Ethel the Aardvark goes Quantity Surveying”.
P: No, no, no, no, no,…What? WHAT??????
C: “Ethel the Aardvark goes Quantity Surveying”.
P: “Ethel the Aa–” YES!!!YES!!! WE’VE GOT IT!! (throwing books wildly about)
I-I’ve seen it somewhere!!! I know it!!! Hee hee hee hee hee!!! Ha ha hoo
ho—WAIT!! WAIT!! Is it?? Is it??? (triumphant) YES!!!!!! Here we are,
“Ethel the Aardvark goes Quantity Surveying”!!!!! There’s your book!!
(throwing it down) Now, BUY IT!!!
C: (quickly) I don’t have enough money.
P: (desperate) I’ll take a deposit!
C: I don’t have ANY money!
P: I’ll take a check!!
C: I don’t have a checkbook!
P: I’ve got a blank one!!
C: I don’t have a bank account!!
P: RIGHT!!!! I’ll buy it FOR you! (ring) There we are, there’s your change,
there’s some money for a taxi on the way home, there’s your book, now, now..
C: Wait, wait, wait!
P: What? What?!? WHAT?!? WHAT???!!
C: I can’t read!!!
P: (staggeringly long pause; very quietly) You can’t…read. (pause) RIGHT!!!
Sit down!! Sit down!! Sit!! Sit!! Are you sitting comfortably???
Right!!! (opens book) “Ethel the Aardvark was hopping down the river valley
one lovely morning, trottety-trottety-trottety, when she might a nice little
quantity surveyor…” (fade out)

[via]

~~~